The Objectives of the Training Seminars

Objective 1: Apply prioritization frameworks to real-life scenarios

• Use tools such as the Eisenhower Matrix, MoSCoW method, or Pareto Principle to organize and rank tasks or options.

Objective 2: Practice structured decision-making techniques

• Work through exercises using decision trees, pros and cons lists, and weighted scoring models.

Objective 3: Apply game-theoretic models to real-world decision-making scenarios

• Use tools such as payoff matrices, best-response dynamics, and Nash equilibrium to guide choices.

Implemented Activities & Compliance to Module 4 Agenda

Both seminars commenced with a presentation of “DeSIRe” program, followed by a concise summary of the training conducted at LUT. Subsequently, the seminar proceeded with an overview of the training topic and the anticipated outcomes. Participants were then invited to share their daily experiences related to prioritization and decision-making.

Interactive Session I focused on introducing priority-setting frameworks designed to enhance the allocation of effort toward high-impact tasks. Participants were first introduced to the Eisenhower Matrix and engaged in a discussion on its practical application in both daily life and professional workflows. This was followed by an introduction to the MoSCoW method, which facilitates the effective distribution of resources based on priority levels. The theoretical portion concluded with an overview of the Pareto Principle, emphasizing its potential to achieve significant results with minimal effort. The practical segment of the session involved collaborative group work. Participants were randomly assigned to groups using a counting method. Each group was given the same set of alternatives and a fixed period of time to analyze them, with each group applying a different prioritization method. The session concluded with group presentations in which participants shared their outcomes and reflected on the similarities, differences, and potential effectiveness of combining the various prioritization techniques.

The theoretical component of Interactive Session II was dedicated to the presentation of structured decision-making methods. Participants were introduced to the Pros and Cons approach, the Weighted Evaluation Model, and the Decision Tree technique. These methods enable the systematic examination of problems or actions from multiple perspectives, the evaluation of alternatives based on defined criteria, and decision-making through a sequence of logical steps.

During the practical portion of the session, participants were again randomly assigned to groups and tasked with analyzing a given case using the three methods, as specified by the provided conditions. Each group then compared their initial, unstructured decision with the one derived through structured analysis and reflected on the effectiveness of the applied methods.

During Interactive session III, the concept of game theory was introduced. Participants engaged in discussions concerning the potential to predict the actions of competing parties within decision-making processes, the influence of one party’s choices on others, and the possibility of altering strategic behavior. The practical component of the session involved analyzing a specific case using a payoff matrix and the Nash equilibrium framework. Participants were once again randomly assigned to groups and given a set amount of time to examine the case in order to identify the dominant strategy for each party. Subsequently, the groups were presented with the optimal solution, allowing participants to compare their own outcomes with the most effective strategy.

The sessions concluded with a discussion on the practical and everyday applicability of the methods and tools presented. Participants were also encouraged to explore the sources included in the presentation provided and to familiarize themselves with the online tools and platforms related to decision-making matrices. Subsequently, participants shared their impressions, expressing high appreciation for both the substantive and practical components of the sessions, as well as the overall organization.